I have the 12mm 92 degree 2 inch ES eyepiece. It works very nicely on my 5 inch Refractor, giving me a True field of just over 1 degree and an exit pupil of 1.5mm.
It compares very well with my 17mm 2 inch TV Nagler for crisp immersive views. I did consider a similar focal length Nagler but the eye relief was too short to wear glasses with. I wanted around 80x at a minimum true field of 1 degree so I took the punt - not so much of a punt though as I already have the ES 24mm 82 degree eyepiece which is very good.
It didn’t disappoint. With an eye relief of 19.9mm, I could get the full field easily wearing my glasses.
The hot young blue stars in M45 at 2 degree width showed beautifully though outside the 1.13 degree eyepiece true field of view.
M42 was very nice also- the Trapezium was beautifully resolved and I was able to get glimpses of the faint E and F stars due good seeing and transparency. The nebulosity was clear and contrasted. I personally, wouldn’t want to go any higher in magnification for M42 or narrower than the 1 degree true field as the view was framed beautifully and was stunning.
It’s a big eyepiece and weighty at 1100g ( though not as heavy as the 1450g 17mm Nagler) so consider scope balance once the focuser is drawn out - It was fine for my tube which is 975mm focal length- I did have to adjust the dovetail to get the balance, though.
I would very much recommend the 12mm 92 deg ES eyepiece on its own but particularly for those who wear glasses and want very near Nagler performance but for whom the eye relief of the Nagler at around this focal length is too short.
I would say you need at least 17mm minimum with eyepieces if you wear glasses. The 17mm Nagler gives 17mm eye relief but at shorter eye piece focal lengths, the range offers insufficient eye relief for glasses wearers- which is where the 82 and 92 degree ES eye pieces fill the gap nicely.

Since the introduction of Tele Vue 80°+ (& imitations) field of view eyepieces, those who have to or prefer to wear eyeglasses have missed out on being able to use eyepieces with very wide apparent fields of view, due to too-short eye relief, &/or too critical eye positioning.

These Explore Scientific 92° eyepieces put that right, at least for the 2 focal lengths made so far. They have eye relief and comfort exceeding any other make or design so far. Their 92° apparent field of view is 10° wider than Naglers, and 8° short of Ethos. But their biggest and best feature is the eye comfort they give, with sufficiently long eye relief, and easy to hold exit pupil. 30 years I have waited for suchlike.

I started by buying the 12.5mm for viewing globular clusters, smaller nebulae and portions of larger starfields. No astigmatism, or edge of field issues, a truly immersive "spacewalk" viewing experience. Not long after I bought the 17.5mm for wider views, Andromeda Galaxy M31, and M42 Orion Nebula, where the larger exit pupil benefits use of narrowband filters like OIII.

If you wear glasses, I recommend these eyepieces for their comfort, ease of use, and for anyone, their superb performance.